Redacted SCO Objections to Wells...

Message ID: 392197
Posted By: b29651
Posted On: 2006-07-18 09:15:00
Subject: Redacted SCO Objections to Wells...

if you read it carefully you might find that all the obfuscations by scox has been for this part here.
it is all about control of the contract .i dont know if wells made a mistake or not but i see what scox is trying for.and they may just be able to make this arguement.the only good thing is when PSJ's are allowed to be filed.then we will get to see what IBM lawyers are made of.
they will have to really be very specific and pin down issues.i expect tons of them.
br3n

Message ID: 392208
Posted By: schmidt3492003
Posted On: 2006-07-18 10:32:00
Subject: Re: Redacted SCO Objections to Wells...

I think this really is the first time we've gotten SCO's theory of the case from SCO in a form that was human-readable (sorry, BIFF, you don't qualify).

The interesting bit is that the Echo newsletter, among other things, pretty clearly blows up any hope of this theory holding water. This filing stinks of desperation -- SCO is starting to make sense only when they feel their case will be thrown out if they keep talking gibberish.

Message ID: 392209
Posted By: b29651
Posted On: 2006-07-18 10:35:00
Subject: Re: Redacted SCO Objections to Wells...

agreed but it still means that the only way to deal with these claims may be PSJ's if i am understanding the process?
that is what is sad about this.kimball might overturn for this argument just because he hasnt ruled on the contract issue?
sigh
scox sucks.
br3n

Message ID: 392212
Posted By: schmidt3492003
Posted On: 2006-07-18 10:40:00
Subject: Re: Redacted SCO Objections to Wells...

What you're saying makes sense, yeah. These may actually be dispositive issues that have to be sorted out on PSJ.

That's kind of a bummer.

IANAL, obviously.

Message ID: 392213
Posted By: b29651
Posted On: 2006-07-18 10:52:00
Subject: Re: Redacted SCO Objections to Wells...

IANAL either and this stinks big time and really hope i am wrong.
sigh
br3n

The texts of these Yahoo Message Board posts have been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board users "b29651", "schmidt3492003" under the following license: License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0.