Message ID: 212386
Posted By: bill_beebe
Posted On: 2004-12-12 09:34:00
Subject: ULTRIX - DEC's poor attempt at Unix
Comments with regards to DEC,
SCOX, and DEC ULTRIX. These comments may or may not help others understand what
DEC was up to during the mid 80s.
I worked for Martin Marietta (now Lockheed
Martin) from 1986-88. I had by my desk a microVAX running DEC ULTRIX. Nothing fancy,
meaning no X. Login was always via terminal, whether it was at the box or across
DECNet. But being DEC gear, it cost a pretty penny. The following "facts" stand
out from my experiences with DEC, VMS, and ULTRIX:
1) ULTRIX was originally
based in BSD 4.2, especially the userland tools.
2) DEC pushed VMS over ULTRIX
where ever possible, and only offered ULTRIX to keep regular UNIX out of big DEC
accounts. DEC considered UNIX to be an adversary on its own hardware; DEC wanted
everything to be DEC, software and hardware. This is the very same reasoning DEC
used when they developed and sold the DEC Rainbow as an answer to the IBM PC.
DEC was no IBM. DEC's entrenched OS was VMS, not UNIX/ULTRIX. So I can see where
DEC just wanted a turn-key version of UNIX with the necessary string changes (i.e.
DEC where appropriate) in the source code. While DEC did provide enough information
about the VAX hardware for the Berkeley group to write software for BSD, I would
be surprised if DEC did not have an agreement equivalent to IBMS's concerning some
special DEC methods and processes with regards to VAX programming hardware. This
would have come out of VMS development and could have even concerned some specific
VMS code moving into the BSD UNIX kernel.
Ah, well. Idle speculation.
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "bill_beebe" under the following license: License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0.
Copyright 2004 Yahoo! SCOX. Messages are owned by the individual posters.