A letter

Message ID: 142318
Posted By: freecode_99
Posted On: 2004-06-08 15:54:00
Subject: A letter

"March 7, 2004

Office of Policy and Evaluation
Room 394
Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20580

The Technical Committee
10500 NE 8th Street, Suite 625
Bellevue, WA 98004

Coordinated State Enforcement of Microsoft Antitrust Judgments
c/o California Office of the Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102

New York State Office of the Attorney General
Attn: Eliot Spitzer
Bureau of Investor Protection and Securities
120 Broadway
New York, NY 10271

Mr. Richard Blumenthal
Attorney General, State of Connecticut
P.O. Box 120
Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0120

Mr. Greg Abbott
Office of the Attorney General
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711-2548

Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Washington Office
1666 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-2803

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
New York Office
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020

Department of Homeland Security
Information Analysis Infrastructure Protection
Washington, D.C. 20528

RE: Complaints of Potential Violations of: Illegal Business Practices, Deceptive and False Representations of Intellectual Property, Racketeering by Wire and Mail Fraud, Extortion, and Collusion in Violation of an Existing Consent Decree

In the Matter of: SCO Group a.k.a. Caldera International; Canopy Group; Microsoft Corporation; Royce & Associates; JHC Capital Management; BayStar Capital; S-2 Partners LLC; Renaissance Ventures; Morgan Keegan; Technology Investment Capital Corporation; Deutsche Bank Securities; Bjurman, Barry & Associates; Legg Mason, Inc.; Capital Guardian Trust Company; Krevlin Advisors, LLC; Empire Capital Partners, LP; The Royal Bank Of Canada; RBC Dain Rauscher; whether wholly, severally, jointly or in part acting together as to
form a de-facto cartel and/or consortium to destroy fair competition and in collusion to violate the rules of fair trade against the community of developers and users of the GNU/Linux Operating System in order to maintain a monopoly and restrain the adoption of ideas and methods not protected under copyright."

I know it exists. Justice knows it exists. So why the delays in acting?

freecode

Message ID: 142371
Posted By: freecode_99
Posted On: 2004-06-08 18:55:00
Subject: Does the letter continue?

In a word: yes.

They have the letter.

freecode

Message ID: 142523
Posted By: freecode_99
Posted On: 2004-06-09 09:13:00
Subject: January 4 Sarbanes-Oxley Letter

"January 4, 2004
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
1666 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-2803

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
1251 Avenue of The Americas
New York, NY 10020

SEC Complaint Center
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549-0213

New York State Office of the Attorney General
Attn: Eliot Spitzer
Bureau of Investor Protection and Securities
120 Broadway
New York, NY 10271

RE: Potential Sarbanes-Oxley violations by the Public Company now known as the SCO Group, formerly known as Caldera, Inc., Caldera Systems, and Caldera International, a Canopy Group company for failure to disclose known risks in SEC filings with consistency for a period of no less than 6 months"

Before you ask luddite, they do have these letters and they are specific as to the violations by section. The non-disclosure of the Novell disagreement over copyright ownership is a violation irregardless of the actual ownership thereof. It is known as a RISK factor.

When first you set out to deceive, you set yourself up for failure. Knowing that I would truly stink at telling a lie, I don't bother. That is called knowing yourself and your limitations, something you might investigate while you are doing your trolling.

Have a nice day, and as you say, unhappy people like yourself must need constant attention. I don't think telling someone to shut up has much merit - free speech is fine with me. You just have to be prepared for the consequences. There isn't much more that can be done to harm me -

< sarcasm>
unless your hit squads try to take me out.
< /sarcasm>

I'm happy enough, I did the right thing by the law. Maybe blowing the whistle scares you (and it should), but it is the right thing to do.

Don't worry, be happy!

freecode

The texts of these Yahoo Message Board posts have been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "freecode_99" under the following license: License: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0.