From: Matthew & Melissa Nuzum <whi...@counsellor.com>
Subject: Unexecutable binaries
Date: 1997/06/13
Message-ID: <5nq44i$5j5$1@news10.gte.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 247997449
Organization: GTE Intelligent Network Services, GTE INS
X-Auth: D800844E418484954A958491
Reply-To: whi...@counsellor.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.questions


Hello there,
	After a year and a half of happily using slakware 3 I decided I could
use the benifits of an upgrade.  Due to curiosity, I chose Red Hat 4.2. 
After about 36 hours I have only one problem left, I can't run some
programs.
	I can be in the /usr/games directory and type the command fortune and
always I get the response command not found.  Despite the fact that ls
shows me a list of all the games on my system, I can't execute a one of
them.  These results are the same no matter how I am logged in (root or
user).
	I have also noticed that I can compile a program and then type the name
of the executable and get the same response.
	This is frustrating.
	If anyone can lend insight it would be greatly apreciated.

Thank You,
Matt

P.S. Please respond via mail and news.

From: dmc...@cts.com (David M. Cook)
Subject: Re: Unexecutable binaries
Date: 1997/06/13
Message-ID: <slrn5q2er3.c21.dmcook@mozart.cts.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 248110238
Cache-Post-Path: optional.cts.com!unk...@psc1194229.cts.com
References: <5nq44i$5j5$1@news10.gte.net>
Organization: CTS Network Services
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.questions


On 13 Jun 1997 00:26:58 GMT, Matthew & Melissa Nuzum 
<whi...@counsellor.com> wrote:

>	After a year and a half of happily using slakware 3 I decided I could
>use the benifits of an upgrade.  Due to curiosity, I chose Red Hat 4.2. 
>After about 36 hours I have only one problem left, I can't run some
>programs.

You must have put "." in your PATH on that Slackware system a long time 
ago and forgot about it!

Dave Cook

From: Matthew & Melissa Nuzum <Ne...@cyberdude.com>
Subject: Re: Unexecutable binaries
Date: 1997/06/20
Message-ID: <5oct28$ml$1@news10.gte.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 251239800
References: <5nq44i$5j5$1@news10.gte.net> <slrn5q2er3.c21.dmcook@mozart.cts.com>
To: "David M. Cook" <dmc...@cts.com>
Organization: GTE Intelligent Network Services, GTE INS
X-Auth: D801960E47D584CD4C8491E0
Reply-To: Ne...@cyberdude.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.questions


David M. Cook wrote:
> 
> On 13 Jun 1997 00:26:58 GMT, Matthew & Melissa Nuzum
> <whi...@counsellor.com> wrote:
> 
> >       After a year and a half of happily using slakware 3 I decided I could
> >use the benifits of an upgrade.  Due to curiosity, I chose Red Hat 4.2.
> >After about 36 hours I have only one problem left, I can't run some
> >programs.
> 
> You must have put "." in your PATH on that Slackware system a long time
> ago and forgot about it!
> 
> Dave Cook

Thanks for the help.  It is amazing what I've forgotten since I first
set up the system to working.  

Is it just me, or is RedHat (or maybe Linux in general) getting focused
away from the shell?  My older system came well set up for shell level
and X was a bugger.  With the new system it's the opposite.  I even had
to figure out how to set up color_ls!  I thought that was assumed since
the early 90's.

Here is a deep thought:
  What REALY is a GPF(OE), and how come I don't experience them under
Linux?  I can't go ten or twelve keystrokes in 95 since I added a Zip
drive, but under Linux, the Zip is a dream come true.  Every thing I
loved about my machine is better in Linux, and everything I hated went
away.

later,
Nuzie

From: "Brian Thurston" <brian_t...@rocketship.com>
Subject: Re: Unexecutable binaries
Date: 1997/06/20
Message-ID: <01bc7d63$fc0128e0$0100007f@bongo.integate.bc.ca>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 251317643
References: <5nq44i$5j5$1@news10.gte.net> 
<slrn5q2er3.c21.dmcook@mozart.cts.com> <5oct28$ml$1@news10.gte.net>
Organization: Internet Gateway Corporation
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.questions


Hi Nuzie:

Basically a GPF or General Protection Fault is an attempt by some process
(program) to access memory outside its assigned boundary.

The problem you appear to be suffering with W95 is not typical. I run
Windows 95 for weeks at a time without incident. I also have NT4, Linux (2
distributions) and OS/2.

They all have their good points and bad - including Linux. I am just
learning the joys (that's sarcasm) of printing to a BJ-200 printer in
Slackware 3.2 Linux - Do you guys all put up with this kind of crap? (I
also have RedHat 4.2 on a different partition and while it prints to the
Canon through Ghostscript, it prints UGLY - DOS, WFWG3.11, W95, NT4, System
7 and OS/2 blow Linux (all versions I have ever seen) out of the water when
it comes to printing ease and quality of output.

Don't get me wrong, I like Linux alot (I bought another 2 gig hd just to
run it), but it is ugly.

You are obviously a smart fellow; If you are having trouble with Windows
95, why don't you just fix it. You aren't suggesting that everyone using a
Zip drive in W95 is typically experiencing GPFs every 12 or so keystrokes,
are you?

I have always found the endless sniping about Windows 95 or NT to be
infantile. It reminds me of the fanaticism and zealotry associated with
some OS/2 and Mac users - it's very unattractive and has done little to
foward their case (just look around).

Hope you get your Zip drive fixed in W95.

Just one guy's opinion.

Regards

Brian.

> Here is a deep thought:

> What REALY is a GPF(OE), and how come I don't experience them under
> Linux?  I can't go ten or twelve keystrokes in 95 since I added a Zip
> drive, but under Linux, the Zip is a dream come true.  Every thing I
> loved about my machine is better in Linux, and everything I hated went
> away.
 
> later,

> Nuzie